IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHARLES ERNST, No. 81149 Appellant, vs. ROSEMARY ERNST, Respondent.

FILED JUN 2 4 2020 ELIZABETH A. aR0WN CLERK OF stimate COURT BY 6.'It DEPUTY *-4-47 OLER1 4).'

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying respondent's motion to re-open discovery regarding appellant's spouse, granting a motion to reopen discovery regarding appellant's finances, denying respondent's motion for a waste judgment against appellant's spouse, and entering judgment against appellant regarding a credit account appellant was previously required to pay. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge.

Review of the notiee of appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Appellant is not aggrieved by the first and third orders. See NRAP 3A(a) (allowing an appeal by an aggrieved party); Valley Bank of Nev. v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 734 (1994) (defining an aggrieved party as one whose personal or property rights are substantially and adversely affected by a ruling of the district court). Additionally, no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the first, second, and fourth orders. See NRAP 3A(b)(8); Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule); Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 59 P.3d 1220 (2002) SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 194 TA ali1a144 , • 423430 • (defining a special order after final judgment). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

f' 0

Ale`uttaa2 J. , J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Charles Ernst Fine Carman Price Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A aglibia 2 -