Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Ansell Vs. Dist. Ct. (Spartan Pools Llc)

Ansell Vs. Dist. Ct. (Spartan Pools Llc)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 13, 2020
Ansell Vs. Dist. Ct. (Spartan Pools Llc)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DOUGLAS ANSELL, No. 81332 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

FILE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and SPARTAN POOLS LLC, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order granting real party in interest's motion for leave to file an amended answer and third-party complaint and motion to extend discovery. Petitioner also seeks an order directing the district court to grant petitioner's countermotion for attorney fees and costs and/or sanctions.

Having considered petitioner's arguments and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, petitioner SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A .Stab 7,0- 74117 has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from a final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.1

A0.04. ,c.J.

Pickering , J. AlAjbauk , J. Hardesty Stiglich cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Popova Law, PLLC Dobberstein Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk 1In light of this order, we deny petitioner's motion to stay as moot. SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 190A eiteto

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.