Ansell Vs. Dist. Ct. (Spartan Pools Llc)
Ansell Vs. Dist. Ct. (Spartan Pools Llc)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DOUGLAS ANSELL, No. 81332 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and SPARTAN POOLS LLC, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order granting real party in interest's motion for leave to file an amended answer and third-party complaint and motion to extend discovery. Petitioner also seeks an order directing the district court to grant petitioner's countermotion for attorney fees and costs and/or sanctions.
Having considered petitioner's arguments and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, petitioner
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .Stab 7,0- 74117 has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from a final judgment.
Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1
A0.04. ,c.J.
Pickering
, J. AlAjbauk , J.
Hardesty Stiglich
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Popova Law, PLLC Dobberstein Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
1In light of this order, we deny petitioner's motion to stay as moot.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 190A eiteto
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.