Smith Vs. Dist. Ct. (Caesars Entm'T Corp.)
Smith Vs. Dist. Ct. (Caesars Entm'T Corp.)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LATONIA SMITH, No. 81357 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH d UDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF TFI l STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CLARK, Respondent, and CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; PHWLV, LLC, D/B/A PLANET HOL I NWOOD RESORT AND CASINO; SHA N NON PIERCE; AND ETHAN THOMAS, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original pro se petition, which we have construed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeks an order directing the district court to reopen and stay petitioner's civil case in A-19-793549-C.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support her claims for relief.
See NRAP 21(a)(d) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to eNcrcise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).
We reiterate that Ipletitioned carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan u. Eighth
"2-10 ill 7 • Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition.
It is so ORDERED.
Add,. C.J.
Pickering
/ 16-A- tAtAt'N , M4G4...0 J. J.
Hardesty Stiglich cc: Latonia Smith Eighth District Court Clerk Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A aeftga
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.