IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF: J. C.-L. No. 81482 J. C.-L., Petitioner, vs. THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JUL 2 2 M20 CARSON CITY; AND THE ELI A. BROWI HONORABLE JAMES E. WILSON, CLE PRE E CO DISTRICT JUDGE, BY DEPUTY CLERK Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This ernergency petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the district court's preliminary prosecutive rnerit procedure in the underlying juvenile delinquency case.

Having reviewed the petition and accompanying appendix, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted at this time.

See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an

'Petitioner's motion to file the appendix under seal because it contains confidential juvenile justice records is granted. SRCR 3; NRS 62H.025. The clerk of this court shall file, under seal, the proposed appendix provisionally received on July 21, 2020.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 4460 P- -0421, extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). The district court has scheduled the requested evidentiary hearing so as to provide petitioner due process.

Should concerns remain thereafter, petitioner may raise his challenges through appropriate means at that time. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty il•

J.

Cadish

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Kay Ellen Armstrong Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 40) 1947A 4446*.