Ceja (Arnoldo) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ARNOLDO CEJA, No. 81389 Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
AUG 0 7 2020 ELIZABETH k BROWN CLERreUPREME COURT C"= ay DEPUTY e " ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge. Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw notice of appeal. Counsel advises this court that he has informed appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing this appeal, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate this appeal, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in this appeal are forever waived. Having been so informed, appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, this court ORDERS this appeal ISSED.1
Gibbons
Aeasba‘.g J ILLAtit) , J. Stiglich Silver
'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
101 I 947A 4aito
020 -Al 113 cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
to) I947A <54017. 2
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.