Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep'T Vs. Dist. Ct. (Taylor)
Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep'T Vs. Dist. Ct. (Taylor)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE No. 81475 DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF AUG 1 0 020 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB ELIZABETH ROWN BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLE FSUjt E COURT Respondents, BY DEpureCLERK and YANCEY TAYLOR; BRIAN ARIZMENDI; AND LAS VEGAS POLICE MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order conapelling arbitration pursuant to a collective bargaining agreernent.
Having considered petitioner's arguments and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, petitioner
za--24 2 has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Atiebtay Pickering
I-„ke._A stAArc J.
Hardesty
Moilsau.0 J.
Stiglich
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Marquis Aurbach Coifing Daniel C. Coe Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME Cow OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A 4,455.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.