Spillino Vs. Warden
Spillino Vs. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL ANTHONY SPILLINO, No. 81587 Appellant, vs. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN; !MED WSCC/NDOC, CWS 1 HENLET; WSCC/NDOC, C/O HERNANDEZ; CIO AUG t 120 LENNON NDOC; AND MED. DIR. A. BROM JOHN DOE, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order regarding a motion for clarification. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
No statute or court rule allows an appeal from an order regarding clarification. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
041;%.$CK.4 Stiglich Silver cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Michael Anthony Spillino Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
lin I n47A 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.