Martinez (Freddy) Vs. State

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREDDY MARTINEZ, A/K/A FREDYS No. 81529 A. MARTINEZ, A/K/A FREDYS

ARCANGLE-MARTINEZ,

Appellant, vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from "the Judgment/Order entered on the 15 day of June, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. First, the district court granted appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Thus, appellant is not aggrieved. See NRS 177.015 (only an aggrieved party may appeal). Second, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for transcripts at state expense and denying a motion for appointment of counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

LIL364,A) A/Wm-a

Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT

OF

NEMDA

(0) 1947A .4ffa3. cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Freddy Martinez

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1,

147A ...4Wta. 9