Richardson Vs. Cabada
Richardson Vs. Cabada
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PETER RICHARDSON, AN No. 81650 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. FILE OSCAR CABADA, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND JOSE ALBERTO CABADA- SEP 2 4 2020 OROZCO, AN INDIVIDUAL, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Res • ondents. BY 6 •\1 DPirlyei c K ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed on August 19, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Drummond Law Firm Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER 4diakia .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.