Nevada Supreme Court, 2020

Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)

Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 24, 2020
Mcdonald (Michael) V.S Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL LEE MCDONALD, No. 81728 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FL IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB SEP 2i 2020 BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELIZABEM A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents, By 5.Y DEPUTY CLERr'../1 ( and

THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND CITY

OF LAS VEGAS,

Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandarnus or prohibition appears to seek an order vacating petitioner's conviction for battery constituting domestic violence on the grounds that he was erroneously deprived of a jury trial.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

((>) 1947A ofzigy.

020 - 35172 We reiterate that Ipletitioned carilies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Aelem. , C.J.

Pickering

•-P.Pf4 11.11e-N , J.

Hardesty cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Michael Lee McDonald

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA tOi 1947A .60e2) 2

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.