IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 81760 Petitioner, VS. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MEC CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JACQUELINE M. BLUTH, DISTRICT SEP 2 2020 JUDGE, EUZ/43E7 1 B9rIN CLERK PitEfrili COURT Respondents, BY Ikr..fttl < and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus appears to seek a writ directing the district court to enter an order dismissing the criminal charges against petitioner on the basis that he did not receive proper notice of the grand jury proceeding under NRS 172.241.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

We reiterate that "[p]etitioned I cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Moreover, to the extent petitioner has counsel below, he must proceed by and through counsel. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1

C.J.

J. , J.

Hardesty Silver

cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Raymond Tyrone Davis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

1Petitioner's failure to provide timely proof of service of the petition constitutes an additional basis upon which to deny relief. NRAP 21(a)(1).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (01 1947À 40110(o