Moon Vs. Lombardo
Moon Vs. Lombardo
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PAUL JAY MOON, No. 81870 Appellant, vs. JOSEPH LOMBARDO, SHERIFF; LVMPD; LVMPD INTERNAL AFFAIRS; LVMPD SEAN KILLEAN #9675; AND FILED LVMPD DETECTIVE JETER, Res • ondents. OCT 2 3( 2020 E 1 7 *Mirk tF ecy, DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court minute order denying multiple motions for failure to allege facts sufficient for the court to grant relief. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge.
Our preliminary review of the documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken), This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the above-mentioned order. See also Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103
3ects-i6 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that a district court's minute order cannot be appealed, and that a written order or judgment must be filed before a district court ruling can be appealed). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
Hardesty
J.
Cadish
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Paul Jay Moon Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 46D10
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.