Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Rogoff Vs. Marsh
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARLENE ROGOFF, No. 81907 Appellant, I e •- • VS. c =-• • • Ce JAMES MARSH, Respondent. OCT ts ..71T ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL •' This is a pro se appeal from "the decision rendered by the Nevada Appellate Court." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.
This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule allows an appeal from a decision of a Nevada appellate court. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
Al4G4--0 J.
Stiglich Silver
'To the extent appellant seeks rehearing of a dispositional order of this court, she must file a petition for rehearing in this court. See NRAP 40.
To the extent appellant seeks reconsideration of a procedural order entered by this court, she must file an appropriate motion in this court. This court expresses no opinion regarding the timeliness or merits of any such petition or motion.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A zo, 3slocr cc: Hon. Trevor L. Atkin, District Judge Marlene Rogoff The Galliher Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.