Dignity Health Vs. Dist. Ct. (Walker)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DIGNITY HEALTH, D/B/A ST. ROSE No. 81283 DOMINICAN HEALTH-SAN MARTIN
CAMPUS; AND ST. ROSE DOMINICAN
MEDICAL PLAZA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, FILED Petitioners, vs. OCT t 5 2020 THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, C EF r MI FAI RT BY . o-44-ipek IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEPUlY CLERK 0 --- CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents, and
GEOFF WALKER,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss a tort action. Having considered the petition, answer, and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (explaining that this c26-3 7928 court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
"44;_5GA...0 , J. Stiglich
, J. Silver cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.