Muhammad-Coleman (Darion) Vs. Warden
Muhammad-Coleman (Darion) Vs. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DARION MUHAMMAD-COLEMAN, No. 82103 A/K/A DARION MUHAMMADCOLEMAN, Appellant, VS. RENEE BAKER, WARDEN, ela:L Respondent. DEC 0 3 M20 ELIZiai tit .4r-zr:VM CLER "iF zUPREME C U BY DEPUFY7.::LEF
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order partially denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
On October 13, 2020, the district court denied in part appellant's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and set an evidentiary hearing regarding the PTSD self-defense theory. Thus, appellant's notice of appeal is premature because a final order resolving all claims has not been entered by the district court. See NRS 177.015(3) (stating that appellant may appeal from a final judgment or verdict); Sandstrom v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 121 Nev. 657, 659, 119 P.3d 1250, 1252 (2005) (explaining that a final order disposes of all issues and leaves nothing for future consideration). Appellant may file an appeal when the
• • •ic,41.‘74;11416-iigi,Itegitt district court has entered an order disposing of the remaining claims.
Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
,A(14c4A Stiglich J. ikAt:4ce.,3 Silver J.
cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Darion Muhammad-Coleman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Waleed Zaman
SuPRemE CouRT OF NEV.ADA (01 1947A 460. 2 -•tL:r - •JIcrr.2.-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.