IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FRONT SIGHT MANAGEMENT LLC, A No. 81776 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY C. DEC 1 6 2020 WILLIAMS, DISTRICT JUDGE, k BROWN pREME COURT Respondents, DEPU CLERK and LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT FUND LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; EB5 IMPACT CAPITAL REGIONAL CENTER LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; EB5 IMPACT ADVISORS LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ROBERT W. DZIUBLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT AND CEO OF LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT FUND LLC AND EB5 IMPACT ADVISORS LLC; JON FLEMING, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN AGENT OF LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT FUND LLC AND EB5 IMPACT ADVISORS LLC; AND LINDA STANWOOD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT FUND LLC AND EB5 IMPACT ADVISORS LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a district court order requiring sealing, but not redaction, of SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A cep lo-m5S-38 certain confidential information obtained in discovery. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not convinced that petitioner has met its burden of demonstrating that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (`Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (observing that "the issuance of a writ of mandamus or prohibition is purely discretionary with this court").

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

.444Ci.-0 , J.

Stiglich

, J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Aldrich Law Firm, Ltd. Bailey Kennedy Eighth District Court Clerk