Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Rippo (Michael) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Rippo (Michael) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 16, 2021

Rippo (Michael) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL DAMON RIPPO, No. 82273 Petitioner, VS. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILE AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE FEB 1 6 202 LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and BY HIEF DEPUTY CLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This pro se original petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondent district court to transmit the judgment of conviction entered on October 27, 2020, in district court case number 92C106784 to the Director of the Department of Corrections. Having reviewed the petition, we are not convinced that our intervention is warranted at this time for two reasons.

First, the respondents do not have a legal duty to transmit the judgment of conviction to the Director, cf. NRS 176.325-.335 (addressing transmission of judgment of conviction), and therefore cannot be compelled to do so through a writ of mandamus. See NRS 34.160 (stating that a writ of mandamus may issue "to compel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust or station"); Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 80 at 3-4 (Dec. 10, 2020) (discussing scope of this court's original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus and requirement "that the act which is to be enforced by the rnandate is that which it is the plain legal duty of the respondent to SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1)47A otSpio 14-0103 perform" (quoting Thomas Carl Spelling, A Treatise on Injunctions and Other Extraordinary Remedies 1173 (2d ed. 1901)). Second, this matter is better suited to relief in the district court in the first instance where the court can ascertain the relevant facts, namely petitioner's current custody classification. See Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) (explaining that "an appellate court is not an appropriate forum in which to resolve disputed questions fact"). For these reasons, we ORDER the petition DENIED. o

J.

Cadish

oat 7 , J.

Pickering

, J.

Herndon

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Michael Damon Rippo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1447A magm

:-..F:?•it..pas

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.