IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREDERICK VONSEYDEWITZ, No. 82657 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS; BRIAN SANDOVAL; ADAM P. LAXALT; ROSS FILE MILLER; CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO; THE STATE OF NEVADA APR 0 a 2021 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 6C,URT JAMES GREG COX; HOWARD SKOLNIK; NEVADA PAROLE BOARD; CONNIE S. BISBEE; THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; AND JAMES WRIGHT, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court "Order Granting Summary Judgment pursuant to Defendants Renewed Motion to Dismiss decided in this action on March 9, 2021." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessica K. Peterson, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. No order granting summary judgment appears on the district court docket sheet. Although it appears that a motion to dismiss was orally granted on March 9, 2021, that oral order is not appealable. See State, Div. of Child and Family Serv's v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) C[IDlispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

I947A .1130.

2_ 1 -fo l OO controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and RD E RS this appeal DISMISSED.'

Parraguirre

oiectic,.0 , J. , J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge Frederick Vonseydewitz Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

1 1 f aggrieved, appellant rnay file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a written order ruling on the motion to dismiss.