Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Durand (Roberto) Vs. State

Durand (Roberto) Vs. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 2021

Durand (Roberto) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERTO C. DURAND, No. 82736 Appellant, FILE VS. APR 2 9 202 THE STATE OF NEVADA, IZAEIErd A. BRO VN Respondent. CLERK OF SUPREME OURT BY DEPUTY CLEM( ROBERTO C. DURAND, No. 82737 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from a district court order denying a motion to modify sentence. This court's review of these appeals reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the order denying a motion to modify sentence on December 10, 2020. Appellant did not file the notices of appeal, however, until April 5, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), this court lacks jurisdiction to consider these appeals, and ORDERS these appeals DISMISSED.

, J.

Cadish

SUPREME COURT OF A , J.

NEVADA Pickering Herndon (0) I947A , 1 - ..; •I •• -," • •' 7' • •-• 1;yibitlitti=ki, -; cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 32 Roberto C. Durand Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

• ia a faa* • ha rlaVat. la;t:11

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.