Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Brantano (Colton) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Brantano (Colton) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 2021

Brantano (Colton) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

COLTON BRANTANO, No. 82780 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, Respondent, APR 2 9 2021 and ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY 5.

DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original pro se petition appears to challenge petitioner's guilty plea agreement as invalid because it was not properly signed and filed by the district court.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Thus, we are not persuaded that petitioner has met his burden to show that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (observing that "the issuance of a writ of

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA (0) 1447A egSDID ,2 16V54 mandamus or prohibition is purely discretionary with this court").

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Hardesty

J. J.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Colton Brantano Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney ighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 10) (947A COMOD , • -IA' • . . .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.