Bonham Vs. State
Bonham Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRYAN PHILLIP BONHAM, No. 82799 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA; THE STATE FILE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JAMES DZURENDA, APR 3 0 2021 DIRECTOR; AND BRIAN WILLIAMS, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK SPPREME COURT SR., WARDEN, BY .y Res • ondents. DEPUTY 4'-'..ttr C1. IK'llr
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for fraud upon the court and request for reversal of order to set aside default. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Bita Yeager, Judge.
No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for fraud upon the court and request for reversal of order to set aside default. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). And although the district court treated the motion as requesting reconsideration, no statute or court rule allows an appeal from the order denying a motion for reconsideration.
Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Ale4c4,,V ,J J.
Stiglich Silver
taqqg —tae, •-: cc: Hon. Bita Yeager, District Judge Bryan Phillip Bonham Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
..;• • r • • •-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.