Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Johnson (Corey) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Johnson (Corey) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 2021

Johnson (Corey) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

COREY JOHNSON, No. 83073 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JOSEPH HARDY, JR., DISTRICT FILED JUDGE, JUL 0 1 2021 Respondents, EUZABETH A. BROWN and CLERK OF SUFRE1Æ COURT BY THE STATE OF NEVADA, DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original pro se petition seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to grant petitioner's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the basis that his due process rights were violated during his parole hearing. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted because an appeal from an adverse ruling below constitutes a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy precluding writ relief. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law, that an appeal is generally an adequate remedy

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 1947A aligfr, t- o 1•14 •=t precluding writ relief, and that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Hardesty

-QIILAIII6J46114.7 J.

Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Corey B. Johnson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I ,M7A atiSr,* 2 s

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.