Weible Vs. Conner
Weible Vs. Conner
Opinion
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN WEIBLE, No. 83057 Appellant, vs. THOMAS CONNER, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; AND THE STATE OF FILED NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR AUG 1 9 2021 VEHICLES, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Res ondents. CLERKg SUPREME COURT \ BY DEPUTY CLEI C).'A,-LII IK "It
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a driver's license revocation matter. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge.
According to the record before us, appellant's driver's license was revoked for 90 days beginning on September 2, 2020. Thus, the 90-day revocation period has expired. In Langston v. State, Departinent of Motor Vehicles, we recognized that after a driver's license revocation period has expired, this court is unable to grant any effective relief on appeal, such that, despite asserted potential collateral consequences, the appeal should
SUPREME COUR oe NEVADA
MI 1947A .6.611.. gi-AgaN be dismissed as moot. 110 Nev. 342, 343, 871 P.2d 362, 363 (1994).
Accordingly, this appeal is moot, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1
J.
Par guirre
J.
Stiglich
kitektoe/t) Silver
cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge Justin Weible Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
1In light of this order, appellant's emergency motions for stay are denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT of NEVADA
0) 1947A .1Pia>
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.