Brooks (Solomon) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Brooks (Solomon) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SOLOMON M. BROOKS, No, 83747 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILE CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of prohibition challenging district court proceedings in case numbers 21-CR-019599, 21- CR-21300, and 17M300089X. On November 9, 2021, this court issued a notice directing petitioner to provide proof of service upon respondents. Petitioner failed to do so. Additionally, petitioner failed to provide this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004)
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
()) 1947A 041#04 ("Petitioner( ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
/ LA. C.J. Hardesty
Ale.4j) , J. 1: 24)1 Parraguirre Stiglich
cc: Solomon M. Brooks Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ADD
y7-„ • tair -.• ditairia ‘,
Reference
- Status
- Published