Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State
Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KIMBALL AUSTIN SACHS, No. 83802 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent. NOV 2 4 2021 ELFLAESET A. BRCINN CLER F "=. PREME COURT
DEPU CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order setting briefing schedule and hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order setting a briefing schedule and hearing, this court lacks jurisdiction
to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Cadish
J. Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
10) 19479 giteit. cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Kimball Austin Sachs Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 45411n⢠2
Reference
- Status
- Published