Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.
Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DANNY TAYLOR, No. 83745 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FILE SERGEANT GENTRY; AARON NOV 2 3 2021 HARROUN; RICHARD WEIRSMA; H k BROWN ROBERT LEGRAND; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, IEF EPUTY CLERK
Res ondents. DANNY TAYLOR, No. 83746 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SERGEANT GENTRY; AARON HARROUN; RICHARD WEIRSMA; ROBERT LEGRAND; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
Docket No. 83745 is a pro se appeal from an order denying motion for evidence establishing damages_ Docket No. 83746 is a pro se appeal from an order denying a-motion for summary judgment. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals two jurisdictional defects. Specifically, neither order designated in the notice of appeal is substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(13). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule
ZI 337.ty provides for an appeal from an order denying motion for evidence establishing damages or from an order denying summary judgment. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS these appeals DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
J. Stiglich
J. Silver
cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Danny Taylor Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Opinion
Reference
- Status
- Published