IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 'STATE OF NEVADA RIO PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A RIO No. 83647 HOTEL AND CASINO, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE NOV 1 0 2021 GLORIA STURMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JEFFREY HARRIS, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying, without prejudice, a motion for summary judgment or to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Generally, this court will not consider writ petitions challenging district court orders denying motions for summary judgment or to dismiss. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 N9v. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997). Moreover, we have recognized that petitions for writ relief should not be utilized as a vehicle for piecemeal appellate review. See W Cab Co. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 133 Nev. 65, 67, 390 P.3d 662, 667 (2017). For this reason, an appeal is generally considered an adequate legal SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (Of 1947A .tW!... 322.8S- remedy precluding writ relief. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004); see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Here, trial is imminent, and petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment. NRAP 3A(b)(1). Thus, we decline to consider this petition for extraordinary writ relief, NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991), and we ORDER the petition DENIED.' Cadish C4/A , J. Herndon cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Brandon Smerber Law Firm Titolo Law Office Eighth District Court Clerk lIn light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA OA 1947A esfac. 2