Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody)
Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ALI SHAHROKHI, No. 83662 Appellant, vs. KIZZY BURROW, Respondent.
FILED OCT 2 8 2021 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER 'DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a series of orders entered by the district court. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Dawn Throne, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b).
This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to disqualify the presiding judge, an order denying motion for sanctions pursuant to NRCP 11, or from an order denying a "Demand for Bill of Particulars and Cause of Accusation U.S. Supnew Cower OF NEVADA <o) 194M Al* t -31077 7....7,1•! . •.;:C4 Constitution 6th Amendment." This court lacks jurisdiction over any of the appealed orders and therefore ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1 •
Cadish
A , J.
Pickering Herndon
cc: Hon. Dawn Throne, District Judge, Family Court Division Ali Shahrokhi Marzola & Ruiz Law Group PLLC Kizzy Burrow Eighth District Court Clerk
1The motion to withdraw as counsel of record for respondent is granted.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) L947A 04e9. f': . ail
Opinion
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.