Bradford (Julius) Vs. State (Death Penalty)
Bradford (Julius) Vs. State (Death Penalty)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JULIUS BRADFORD, No. 83417 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. SEP 3 0 2021 ELIZAB H A. BROWN CLERK OF PREME 01..1E1 DEPUTY CLERK-- ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to dismiss felony-murder theory as legally inadequate, denying a pretrial motion to dismiss felony-murder theory as being violative of the double jeopardy clause, and denying a pretrial motion to dismiss felony-murder theory as being violative of the ex post facto and due process clauses.' Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).
Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
J.
Stiglich Silver 'Appellant's appeal from the judgment of conviction was reversed and remanded. Bradford v. State, Docket No. 62108 (Order of Reversal and SUPREME COURT OF Remand, October 24, 2017).
NEVADA (0) I947A 4446*9 cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Julius Bradford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Lisa A. Rasmussen
SUPReNE COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A <4V.
Opinion
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.