Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Narach, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Shah, M.D.)

Narach, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Shah, M.D.)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 2021

Narach, M.D. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Shah, M.D.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIENCHAI NARACH, M.D., No. 83395 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT SEP 1 b 2021 JUDGE, Respondents, and MARY ANN LYONS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN LYONS; WENDY CASH, INDIVIDUALLY; DHAVAL SHAH, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; CLINTON ANDERSON, PAC; CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS (ITANI) PC, A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; MILAN PATEL, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; AND SUNRISE MOUNTAINVIEW HOSPITAL, INC., A NEVADA DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a professional negligence matter. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

tO) I94M 4W . .Tora 1-Z61O tì burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.

Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we do not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying a motion to dismiss a complaint, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rule applies here. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 283. (1997). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

Hardesty

Ae4C4,...0 , J. Sr.J.

Stiglich

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Collinson, Daehnke, Inlow & Greco McBride Hall Claggett & Sykes Law Firm Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA » 19-DA

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TIENCHAI NARACH, M.D., No. 83395 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT SEP 1 b 2021 JUDGE, Respondents, and MARY ANN LYONS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN LYONS; WENDY CASH, INDIVIDUALLY; DHAVAL SHAH, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; CLINTON ANDERSON, PAC; CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS (ITANI) PC, A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; MILAN PATEL, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; AND SUNRISE MOUNTAINVIEW HOSPITAL, INC., A NEVADA DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a professional negligence matter. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA tO) I94M 4W . .Tora 1-Z61O tì burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we do not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying a motion to dismiss a complaint, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rule applies here. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 283. (1997). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.' Hardesty Ae4C4,...0 , J. Sr.J. Stiglich cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Collinson, Daehnke, Inlow & Greco McBride Hall Claggett & Sykes Law Firm Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk 1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 » 19-DA

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.