Nevada Supreme Court, 2021

Mack, Sr. (James) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)

Mack, Sr. (James) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 2021

Mack, Sr. (James) Vs. Dist. Ct. (Warden)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAMES KEVIN MACK, SR., No. 83469 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, SEP 1 5 2021 Respondent, CLE A. BROWN pRue and BY DEPUTY CLERX KYLE OLSEN, WARDEN, WSCC, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition appears to seek a writ ordering the district court "to answer the petitioner [sici writ of habeas corpus filed October 17, 2019." Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with any exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief.

See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPREIAE COURT OF NEVADA

i 947A 4§Bilo. 1 - 7.67-35" Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21.(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Hardesty

Parraguirre Stiglich

cc: James Kevin Mack, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

- t 4 •R=. z `1 .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.