Accomando Vs. Accomando
Accomando Vs. Accomando
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 83716 Appellant, vs. GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, FILED Respondent. DEC 13 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY •\10-4-4-14-41k./ DEPUTY CLERX 0 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order awarding temporary spousal support and making other temporary orders. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule); see generally In re Ternporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Cadish
Herndon
el) - 36 cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC. Eighth District Court Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Published