IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL LUIS COTA, No. 83951 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

MICHAEL LUIS COTA, s/ No. 83957 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying motion to hold counsel in contempt and directing counsel to resend portions of case file. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to hold counsel in contempt and directing counsel to resend portions of case file in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider these appeals. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d SUPFIEPAE COUPT OF NEVADA

0:41 I947A AD. 21- o r ! .4t....;•;;;; 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS these appeals dismissed.'

t, ea 4 _tt ,J. Hardesty

J. J. Stiglich Herndon

cc: Michael Luis Cota Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden John Malone Douglas County Clerk

'Given this order, this court takes no action on the pro se letters filed on January 3, 2022.

This court anticipates that counsel will promptly provide appellant with any portions of the case file that appellant claims to be missing, if counsel has not done so already.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 Ith 1947A Gra*

• _