Cota (Michael) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MICHAEL LUIS COTA, •-/ No. 83951
Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
MICHAEL LUIS COTA, No. 83957
Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED
Respondent.
JAN 1 8 2022
A. BROWN PROM COURT CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying motion to hold counsel in contempt and directing counsel to resend portions of case file. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Thomas W. Gregory, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to hold counsel in contempt and directing counsel to resend portions of case file in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction
SUPREME COURT
OF to consider these appeals. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d NEvADA
KY; 1947A .GiEWS>
7.1-7744WW11 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS these appeals dismissed.'
ILtverL.ttn , J.
Hardesty , J.
Stiglich Herndon cc: Michael Luis Cota
Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden John Malone Douglas County Clerk
'Given this order, this court takes no action on the pro se letters filed on January 3, 2022.
This court anticipates that counsel will promptly provide appellant with any portions of the case file that appellant claims to be missing, if
SUPREME COURT counsel has not done so already.
OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4.1140,4
,
- • Prvv,fi
41- ;1111„fv.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.