Nevada Supreme Court, 2022

Bonham v. Cegavske

Bonham v. Cegavske
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 27, 2022
Bonham v. Cegavske

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA BRYAN PHILLIP BONHAM, No. 83825 Petitioner, vs. FILED BARBARA K. CEGAVSKE, Respondent.

A BROWN ctEms me COURT ey

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner has failed to file with the petition any appendix. NRAP 21(a)(4) (explaining that it is the petitioner's obligation to provide an appendix that includes all records that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'

, C.J.

Parraguirre

A 6--t J.

Hardesty

Al; 2jci--0

Stiglich

'Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to obtain in forma pauperis status is denied, as this court has already waived the filing fee in this matter.

SUPREPAE COURT

Of NEVADA

(0) I947A .44gto.

- ?S. 1

_ • 1- . • .e cc: Bryan Phillip Bonham

Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A .S0p.•

..„

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.