E&T Ventures, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Euphoria Wellness, Llc)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

E&T VENTURES, LLC, No. 84133 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

FILE JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT FEB 1 0 2022 JUDGE, A. BROWN UPREME COURT Respondents,

DEP TY CLERK and

EUPHORIA WELLNESS, LLC, A

NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order setting an evidentiary hearing to determine discovery sanctions, directing the nonparty who verified interrogatory responses on behalf of petitioner to appear, and directing counsel for petitioner to serve the order on the nonparty.

Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA on 1947A 47/Y. .61

Z 2-09 s32- relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED)

Acz_A velk J.

Hardesty

Stiglich

Herndon cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge

Law Office of Mitchell Stipp

Jones Lovelock

Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.