Accomando v. Accomando
Accomando v. Accomando
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 84097 Appellant, vS. GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, Respondent.
FILED FEB 1 1 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By "5 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order entered on October 15, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. No district court order was entered on October 15, 2021. To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from the cancellation of a hearing on his motion to determine respondent's mental health, such a cancellation is not appealable. See Brown v. WIC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court „ may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule").
Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 407.4P4.- - ozI613 cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cOatt,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.