Trejo (Mario) v. State
Trejo (Mario) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO BLADIMIR TREJO, No. 84188 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FIL Respondent.
FEB 2 it 2022 ELIZAti .11A. ei CLE lOF LIPREMZ COURT CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Erika D. Ballou, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a pretrial "motion to dismiss case/prosecutorial misconduct and perjury", this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. NRS 177.015(1)(h) (stating that State or defendant may appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Silver
Ae,64. , J.
Pickering SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
01 1947A 2„:1- 601 3 cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge Mario Bladirnir Trejo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
OA I 947A 4740:17,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.