Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.

Supreme Court

OF

NEVADA (0) 197A <I

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIMOTHY HOWARD JOHNSON, No. 84163

Petitioner,

Vs.

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAR 11 2022

PERSHING; AND THE HONORABLE cphecn4a. Brown

JIM C. SHIRLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERIC gr SUPREME COURT Respondents. 6 aoa eene

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original pro se petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to take action on four motions allegedly filed. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that “[pJetitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.” Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre ~“ pA. kaa, a. AVG 9 od.

Hardesty Stiglich fee oer

Rey eT ED cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge

Timothy Howard Johnson

Attorney General/Carson City

Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

Supreme Court

OF

NEVADA

0) 19474 BIO