Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIMOTHY HOWARD JOHNSON, No. 84163 Petitioner, vs.

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MAR 1 1 2022 PERSHING; AND THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH A. BROWN JIM C. SHIRLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERK,QF SUPREME COURT BY f") Respondents. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original pro se petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to take action on four motions allegedly filed. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that "[Metitioned I cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

It is so ORDERED.

tT4k%-4- '4-j14; 9'7f6"7"- .vc n.

Parraguirre

Al4C4,0 j. Hardesty Stiglich SUPREME COURT

Of

NEVADA

40) 1947A ofetto

.*.ja jr atittagattrAZ-r , cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge

Timothy Howard Johnson

Attorney General/Carson City

Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A MOOD atilt"