Accomando v. Accomando
Accomando v. Accomando
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARIO ACCOMANDO, Nco 84415 Appellant, vs. FILE GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, Respondent. APR 0 7 2022 ELIZAB A. BROWN CLE ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPUYY CLERK This is a pro se appeal from a district court order resolving a divorce. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). Although a draft divorce decree may have been prepared, review of the district court docket entries reveals that no written order has yet been filed by the court. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and therefore ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Hardesty
J.
Stiglich
22,-031 Sz cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A aggat.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.