IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA PETER JASON HELFRICH, No. 84388 Petitioner, Fi 1 r vs. tar KIRK VITTO; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Res s ondents. ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus that would direct respondents to act in a federal case. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.' Parraguirre J. Hardesty J. Stiglich 1 We further decline to address the notice petitioner filed on March 16, 2022, as our decision renders it moot. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I q47A — t2_616 ce: Peter Jason Helfrich Attorney General/Carson City SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 KO 1947A argig0