Barnett (Corry) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CORRY THOMAS BARNETT, A/K/A No. 84840 COREY THOMAS BARNETT,

Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK, JUN 2 4 2022 Respondent, and

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to compel the district court to order the production of certain records. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

, J. Hardesty Stiglich cc: Corry Thomas Barnett

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(01 I7A .015,0D