Sfr Invs. Pool 1, Llc v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Nat'L Ass'N
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, A No. 83214 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY,
Appellant, vs.
F JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CLE EY Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from a district court final judgment in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District, Court, Clark County; Jessica K. Peterson, Judge.'
In a previous appeal, we reversed the district court's summary judgment in favor of appellant and directed the district court to enter judgment in favor of respondent. See JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR hum. Pool 1, LLC, 136 Nev. 596, 603, 475 P.3d 52, 58-59 (2020). On remand, the district court complied with this court's mandate. Now in this appeal, appellant contends that another remand is appropriate because it should be able to seek money damages based on the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021).2 We decline appellant's invitation to remand again, as appellant did not raise its Co//ins-based argument in district court, and we are not persuaded by appellant's explanation for why it was unable to previously make arguments similar to those asserted by the plaintiffs in Collins. See Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981) (recognizing that this court need not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.3
J. Sr.J.
cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge Hanks Law Group
Ballard Spahr LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
3The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignrnent. SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
011 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.