Nevada Supreme Court, 2022

Hurd v. Opipari

Hurd v. Opipari
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 10, 2022

Hurd v. Opipari

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KYMBERLIE JOY HURD, No. 84784 Appellant, vs. FILED MARIO OPIPARI, Respondent. JUN 1 Û 2022 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to set aside pretrial emergency orders regarding visitation and custody.

Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Bill Henderson, Judge.

The order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule allows for an appeal from the designated order. See generally In re Temporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). This court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Piekm , Pickering

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A Z2-18911 cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division Kymberlie Joy Hurd Crome Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEvACIA (01 I947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.