Mitchell v. Carson City Sheriff'S Office
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CHAD WINDHAM MITCHELL, No. 84783
Appellant, vs. FILED CARSON CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,
Respondent.
JUN 0 9 2022 ti A. BROWN UPREME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
CLERK This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's request for submission of his petition on the ground that appellant has not served the petition on the respondent. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
The order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a request for submission. This court lacks jurisdiction and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
Hardesty A-asbau.0 ,J
Stiglich Herndon
'Given this dismissal, this court takes no action in regard to SUPREME COMM appellanes letter filed on June 7, 2022.
OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A <4111D1114 cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge
Chad Windham Mitchell Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
(0) I947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.