Nevada Supreme Court, 2022

Havens v. Leong

Havens v. Leong
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 24, 2022

Havens v. Leong

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WARREN HAVENS, No. 84471 Appellant, vs. ARNOLD LEONG; AND CHERYL CHOY, FILED Res • ondents. MAY 2 4 2022 ELVASETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 5: t DEP Y C1:Ln ERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a notice of intent to file a notice of appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elham Roohani, Judge. Preliminary review of the notice and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant appeals from the district court's minute order. The district court's minute order is not effective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004). Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' Aa-A J Hardesty ,easbezt_O Stiglich Herndon 'Additionally, in his docketing statement for a related appeal in Docket No. 84309, appellant states in regard to this appeal that the "district SUPREME COURT court created this appeal. I did not. . . . It is not a Notice of Appeal." OF NEVADA (0) I947A atgagi. co? - uo iv-10 cc: Hon. Elham Roohani, District Judge Warren Havens Ben's Law Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A GifFit:1> 2

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WARREN HAVENS, No. 84471 Appellant, vs. ARNOLD LEONG; AND CHERYL CHOY, FILED Res • ondents.

MAY 2 4 2022 ELVASETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By 5: t DEP Y C1:Ln ERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a notice of intent to file a notice of appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elham Roohani, Judge.

Preliminary review of the notice and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant appeals from the district court's minute order. The district court's minute order is not effective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004).

Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

Aa-A J Hardesty

,easbezt_O Stiglich Herndon

'Additionally, in his docketing statement for a related appeal in Docket No. 84309, appellant states in regard to this appeal that the "district SUPREME COURT court created this appeal. I did not. . . . It is not a Notice of Appeal." OF NEVADA (0) I947A atgagi. co? - uo iv-10 cc: Hon. Elham Roohani, District Judge Warren Havens Ben's Law Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A GifFit:1>

Opinion

Supreme Count oF NEvaADA (0) 167A =RBRD IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WARREN HAVENS, No. 84471 Appellant, vs. ARNOLD LEONG; AND CHERYL i CHOY, | FILED Respondents. — MAY 24 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY Uo ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a notice of intent to file a notice of appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elham Roohani, Judge. Preliminary review of the notice and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant appeals from the district court’s minute order. The district court’s minute order is not effective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004). Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.! / AL. Laake, J. Hardesty AVGED ss. A-———. J. Stighch Herndon \Additionally, in his docketing statement for a related appeal in Docket No. 84309, appellant states in regard to this appeal that the “district court created this appeal. I did not. .. . It is not a Notice of Appeal.” A2-1W440O Supreme Count OF NevaDA (0) IMTA cc: Hon. Elham Roohani, District Judge Warren Havens Ben's Law Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.