Isso, Esq. v. Gaar
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JENNIFER ISSO, ESQ., No. 84621
Appellant, vs.
FILED HENRY E. GAAR, AUG O 4 2022
Respondent. EtNN
ELI FM
:iiUFRENC: COURT ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL D t.A.ERK
This is an appeal from a district court order affirming and adopting the findings of the discovery commissioner regarding issues arising during the discovery process. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge.
Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed potential jurisdictional defects. Specifically, it appeared that appellant lacked standing to bring this appeal and that the challenged order is not substantively appealable. Accordingly, this court directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant has filed her response to this court's show cause order in which she expresses her intention to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, appellant's request for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED,
Hardesty A"14CtA--iQ , J.
Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA 19-17A cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division
Israel Kunin, Settlement Judge Isso & Hughes Law Firm Jacobson Law Office, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
40) 1947A 694;r:IP
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.