Bowles v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TRAVIS WILFORD BOWLES, No. 84969 Petitioner, vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA FILED DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

OFFENDER MANAGEMENT AUG 1 8 2022 DIVISION, ELIZAMH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondent. BY__ • \ Z_ DV:PUTY6C

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents CCessential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre n

L.ewi J. Hardesty Stiglich

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

10.) 1947A -,2523SC9 cc: Travis Wilford Bowles

Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

I 4)47 A