S. Nev. Auto Sales, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Gonzales, M.D.)
S. Nev. Auto Sales, Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Gonzales, M.D.)
Opinion
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SOUTHERN NEVADA AUTO SALES, No. 84903 LLC, D/B/A OPEN LOT USED CAR SALES, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FR.
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF AUG 1 1 2022 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE BITA A. BROWN PREME COURT YEAGER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, DEPU CLERK and FRANKIE GONZALES, M.D., Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a torts action. Having considered the petition and its documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Walker u. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 678, 683, 476 P.3d 1194, 1198 (2020) (declining to grant writ relief when a later appeal was available); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition).
Generally, we will not consider writ petitions that challenge orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A general rule applies here. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist.
Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197-98, 179 P.3d 556, 558-59 (2008) (discussing writ petitions challenging denials of motions to dismiss). We therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.'
ÇJ , C.J.
Parraguirre •
J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Bita Yeager, District Judge Kravitz Schnitzer Johnson Watson & Zeppenfeld, Chtd.
Injury Lawyers of Nevada Huang & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk
1TheHonorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (o) I947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.